Evaluation |
|
Superb 25-19 |
Mediocre 18-9 | Failure 8-0 |
| Written Work | Written Work addresses all assigned material with appropriate spelling, punctuation, and grammar | Most Written Work is addressed. There are some spelling, punctuation, and grammar mistakes. | Missing all or most Written Work. Many spelling, punctuation, or grammar mistakes. |
| Photos/Artifacts | All photos and artifacts are of high quality, and pertain directly to your topic | Missing some photos/artifacts, may be of poor quality, or the viewer is not sure how they pertain to your topic. | Missing all or most of the photos/artifacts. |
| Citation | All sources are cited in the MLA format. | MLA format is incomplete. Some, but not all of the sites have been documented. | Missing citation, or cited wrong. |
| Presentation | The topic is presented clearly and professionally. The presentation displays knowledge gained from the project. | Some knowledge is presented. Presentation has flaws. | No knowledge is presented by the group. Information is not clear to the audience. Unprofessional presentation. |
| Display | Exhibit display is creative, interesting to the audience, and displays knowledge gained from the project. | The display is lacking any one of the 3 criteria listed in the superb section of the rubric. | The display is missing 2 or more of the criteria from the superb section of the rubric |
| Overall | The display, presentation, and criteria have met all of the above criteria and is "Museum Quality." | The display is lacking in some of the above criteria, but is a good exhibit. | The display lacks too much of the criteria needed. |
| Process |
 |
 |
 |
 |